VS
stockvs
Go to ScreenerHub
0A1K.L

0A1K.L vs PAH3.DE

PAH3.DE

In the past 12 months, 0A1K.L returned +20% while PAH3.DE lost 16%.

ValuationGrowthProfitabilityBalance SheetPerformance
0A1K.L
0A1K.L

NIO Inc.

$6.08
22.1%(1M)
Market Cap13.8B
Consumer Cyclical
Auto - Manufacturers
CN
P/E Ratio-3.74
ROE-9.8%
P/B Ratio23.25
Dividend Yield0.0%
PAH3.DE
PAH3.DE

Porsche Automobil Holding SE

$36.58
-10.2%(1M)
Market Cap11.2B
Consumer Cyclical
Auto - Manufacturers
DE
P/E Ratio-0.48
ROE-60.9%
P/B Ratio0.29
Dividend Yield5.7%
Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

0A1K.L leads 5/8
0A1K.L

0A1K.L

NIO Inc.

+20.4%

1Y Return

PAH3.DE

PAH3.DE

Porsche Automobil Holding SE

-16.5%

1Y Return

0A1K.L
0A1K.L
PAH3.DE
PAH3.DE

Short Term

1M-6M

0A1K.L
+10.1%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

0A1K.L
+19.0%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

PAH3.DE
-42.8%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

0A1K.L: 3PAH3.DE: 2
Metric0A1K.LPAH3.DEWinner
P/E Ratio

Price to earnings ratio

-3.74-0.480A1K.L
Forward P/E

Forward price to earnings ratio

0.000.00Tie
P/S Ratio

Price to sales ratio

1.18-0.48PAH3.DE
P/B Ratio

Price to book ratio

23.250.29PAH3.DE
P/FCF Ratio

Price to free cash flow ratio

-2.7614.510A1K.L
EV/EBITDA

Enterprise value to EBITDA

-6.42-0.740A1K.L
PEG Ratio

Price/earnings to growth ratio

0.000.00Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

0A1K.L: 3PAH3.DE: 3
Metric0A1K.LPAH3.DEWinner
Gross Margin

Gross profit margin

11.2%100.1%PAH3.DE
Operating Margin

Operating profit margin

-28.8%100.2%PAH3.DE
Net Margin

Net profit margin

-31.5%98.8%PAH3.DE
ROE

Return on equity

-9.8%-60.9%0A1K.L
ROA

Return on assets

-12.4%-49.7%0A1K.L
ROIC

Return on invested capital

-26.9%-50.1%0A1K.L

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

0A1K.L: 4PAH3.DE: 0
Metric0A1K.LPAH3.DEWinner
Revenue Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year revenue growth

18.2%-481.0%0A1K.L
Revenue Growth (3Y)

3-year revenue CAGR

22.1%0.0%0A1K.L
Revenue Growth (5Y)

5-year revenue CAGR

53.1%0.0%0A1K.L
EPS Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year EPS growth

11.3%-492.8%0A1K.L
EPS Growth (3Y)

3-year EPS CAGR

0.0%0.0%Tie
EPS Growth (5Y)

5-year EPS CAGR

0.0%0.0%Tie

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

0A1K.L: 1PAH3.DE: 4
Metric0A1K.LPAH3.DEWinner
Debt/Equity

Debt to equity ratio

7.530.20PAH3.DE
Current Ratio

Current assets to current liabilities

0.9414.28PAH3.DE
Quick Ratio

Quick assets to current liabilities

0.8314.28PAH3.DE
Interest Coverage

EBIT to interest expense

-22.51-59.180A1K.L
Beta

Stock volatility vs market

1.160.94PAH3.DE
Summary
0A1K.L wins 2-1

Valuation

0A1K.L

Profitability

Tie

Growth

0A1K.L

Balance Sheet

PAH3.DE

0A1K.L is more attractively valued. 0A1K.L demonstrates better growth. PAH3.DE has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons
0A1K.L 0A1K.L vs 7269.T 7269.T0A1K.L 0A1K.L vs STLA STLA0A1K.L 0A1K.L vs RIVN RIVN7269.T 7269.T vs PAH3.DE PAH3.DEPAH3.DE PAH3.DE vs STLA STLAPAH3.DE PAH3.DE vs RIVN RIVN
Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 0A1K.L and PAH3.DE with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison
Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 0A1K.L vs PAH3.DE on stockvs.app
<a href="https://stockvs.app/0A1K.L/vs/PAH3.DE" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 0A1K.L vs PAH3.DE on stockvs.app
</a>