Which stock is better: 0A1K.L or 7269.T?

The comparison between NIO Inc. (0A1K.L) and Suzuki Motor Corporation (7269.T) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 0A1K.L vs 7269.T?

0A1K.L has a P/E ratio of -3.74, while 7269.T has a P/E ratio of 9.84. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 0A1K.L and 7269.T?

0A1K.L has a market cap of approximately 13.8B, while 7269.T has a market cap of approximately 22.9B.

0A1K.L vs 7269.T

Name: 0A1K.L Stock
Brand: NIO Inc.
Price: 6.08 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, 0A1K.L returned +20% while 7269.T gained 4%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

0A1K.L

NIO Inc.

$6.08

22.1%(1M)

Market Cap13.8B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio-3.74

ROE-9.8%

P/B Ratio23.25

Dividend Yield0.0%

7269.T

Suzuki Motor Corporation

$11.89

-19.1%(1M)

Market Cap22.9B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio9.84

ROE13.3%

P/B Ratio1.22

Dividend Yield2.1%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

0A1K.L

NIO Inc.

+20.4%

1Y Return

7269.T

Suzuki Motor Corporation

+4.4%

1Y Return

0A1K.L

7269.T

Short Term

1M-6M

+10.1%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+19.0%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+92.9%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

0A1K.L: 37269.T: 2

Metric	0A1K.L	7269.T	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	-3.74	9.84	0A1K.L
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	1.18	0.67	7269.T
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	23.25	1.22	7269.T
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	-2.76	15.61	0A1K.L
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	-6.42	4.07	0A1K.L
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

0A1K.L: 07269.T: 6

Metric	0A1K.L	7269.T	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	11.2%	25.7%	7269.T
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	-28.8%	9.4%	7269.T
Net Margin Net profit margin	-31.5%	6.8%	7269.T
ROE Return on equity	-9.8%	13.3%	7269.T
ROA Return on assets	-12.4%	6.4%	7269.T
ROIC Return on invested capital	-26.9%	8.2%	7269.T

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

0A1K.L: 47269.T: 2

Metric	0A1K.L	7269.T	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	18.2%	8.4%	0A1K.L
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	22.1%	17.7%	0A1K.L
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	53.1%	10.8%	0A1K.L
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	11.3%	31.6%	7269.T
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	37.7%	7269.T
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	-27.9%	0A1K.L

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

0A1K.L: 07269.T: 5

Metric	0A1K.L	7269.T	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	7.53	0.23	7269.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	0.94	1.66	7269.T
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.83	1.23	7269.T
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	-22.51	21.30	7269.T
Beta Stock volatility vs market	1.16	0.24	7269.T

Summary

Valuation

0A1K.L

Profitability

7269.T

Growth

0A1K.L

Balance Sheet

7269.T

0A1K.L is more attractively valued. 7269.T shows stronger profitability. 0A1K.L demonstrates better growth. 7269.T has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 0A1K.L and 7269.T with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 0A1K.L vs 7269.T on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/0A1K.L/vs/7269.T" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 0A1K.L vs 7269.T on stockvs.app
</a>