Which stock is better: 0A1K.L or RIVN?

The comparison between NIO Inc. (0A1K.L) and Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 0A1K.L vs RIVN?

0A1K.L has a P/E ratio of -3.74, while RIVN has a P/E ratio of -5.59. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 0A1K.L and RIVN?

0A1K.L has a market cap of approximately 13.8B, while RIVN has a market cap of approximately 19B.

0A1K.L vs RIVN

Name: 0A1K.L Stock
Brand: NIO Inc.
Price: 6.08 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, RIVN returned +39% while 0A1K.L gained 20%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

0A1K.L

NIO Inc.

$6.08

22.1%(1M)

Market Cap13.8B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio-3.74

ROE-9.8%

P/B Ratio23.25

Dividend Yield0.0%

RIVN

Rivian Automotive, Inc.

$15.33

-6.9%(1M)

Market Cap19B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

USA

P/E Ratio-5.59

ROE-66.5%

P/B Ratio4.47

Dividend Yield0.0%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

RIVN leads 5/8

0A1K.L

NIO Inc.

+20.4%

1Y Return

RIVN

Rivian Automotive, Inc.

+39.1%

1Y Return

0A1K.L

RIVN

Short Term

1M-6M

+10.1%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+19.0%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

-51.9%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

0A1K.L: 1RIVN: 4

Metric	0A1K.L	RIVN	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	-3.74	-5.59	RIVN
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	1.18	3.80	0A1K.L
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	23.25	4.47	RIVN
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	-2.76	-8.22	RIVN
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	-6.42	-9.01	RIVN
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

0A1K.L: 6RIVN: 0

Metric	0A1K.L	RIVN	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	11.2%	2.7%	0A1K.L
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	-28.8%	-66.5%	0A1K.L
Net Margin Net profit margin	-31.5%	-67.7%	0A1K.L
ROE Return on equity	-9.8%	-66.5%	0A1K.L
ROA Return on assets	-12.4%	-24.5%	0A1K.L
ROIC Return on invested capital	-26.9%	-27.9%	0A1K.L

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

0A1K.L: 2RIVN: 2

Metric	0A1K.L	RIVN	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	18.2%	8.4%	0A1K.L
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	22.1%	48.1%	RIVN
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	53.1%	0.0%	0A1K.L
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	11.3%	34.5%	RIVN
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

0A1K.L: 1RIVN: 4

Metric	0A1K.L	RIVN	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	7.53	1.46	RIVN
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	0.94	2.33	RIVN
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.83	1.89	RIVN
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	-22.51	-13.08	RIVN
Beta Stock volatility vs market	1.16	1.75	0A1K.L

Summary

RIVN wins 2-1

Valuation

RIVN

Profitability

0A1K.L

Growth

Tie

Balance Sheet

RIVN

RIVN is more attractively valued. 0A1K.L shows stronger profitability. RIVN has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 0A1K.L and RIVN with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 0A1K.L vs RIVN on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/0A1K.L/vs/RIVN" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 0A1K.L vs RIVN on stockvs.app
</a>