VS
stockvs
Go to ScreenerHub
7270.T

7270.T vs PAH3.DE

PAH3.DE

In the past 12 months, 7270.T returned -10% while PAH3.DE lost 16%.

ValuationGrowthProfitabilityBalance SheetPerformance
7270.T
7270.T

Subaru Corporation

$16.07
-17.0%(1M)
Market Cap11.5B
Consumer Cyclical
Auto - Manufacturers
JP
P/E Ratio18.70
ROE3.8%
P/B Ratio0.71
Dividend Yield4.6%
PAH3.DE
PAH3.DE

Porsche Automobil Holding SE

$36.58
-10.2%(1M)
Market Cap11.2B
Consumer Cyclical
Auto - Manufacturers
DE
P/E Ratio-0.48
ROE-60.9%
P/B Ratio0.29
Dividend Yield5.7%
Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

PAH3.DE leads 5/8
7270.T

7270.T

Subaru Corporation

-9.8%

1Y Return

PAH3.DE

PAH3.DE

Porsche Automobil Holding SE

-16.5%

1Y Return

7270.T
7270.T
PAH3.DE
PAH3.DE

Short Term

1M-6M

PAH3.DE
-14.4%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

7270.T
-17.6%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

7270.T
+2.3%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

7270.T: 1PAH3.DE: 4
Metric7270.TPAH3.DEWinner
P/E Ratio

Price to earnings ratio

18.70-0.48PAH3.DE
Forward P/E

Forward price to earnings ratio

0.000.00Tie
P/S Ratio

Price to sales ratio

0.42-0.48PAH3.DE
P/B Ratio

Price to book ratio

0.710.29PAH3.DE
P/FCF Ratio

Price to free cash flow ratio

12.8614.517270.T
EV/EBITDA

Enterprise value to EBITDA

3.53-0.74PAH3.DE
PEG Ratio

Price/earnings to growth ratio

0.000.00Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

7270.T: 3PAH3.DE: 3
Metric7270.TPAH3.DEWinner
Gross Margin

Gross profit margin

15.7%100.1%PAH3.DE
Operating Margin

Operating profit margin

3.5%100.2%PAH3.DE
Net Margin

Net profit margin

2.2%98.8%PAH3.DE
ROE

Return on equity

3.8%-60.9%7270.T
ROA

Return on assets

2.0%-49.7%7270.T
ROIC

Return on invested capital

3.0%-50.1%7270.T

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

7270.T: 6PAH3.DE: 0
Metric7270.TPAH3.DEWinner
Revenue Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year revenue growth

-0.4%-481.0%7270.T
Revenue Growth (3Y)

3-year revenue CAGR

19.5%0.0%7270.T
Revenue Growth (5Y)

5-year revenue CAGR

7.0%0.0%7270.T
EPS Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year EPS growth

-10.1%-492.8%7270.T
EPS Growth (3Y)

3-year EPS CAGR

71.2%0.0%7270.T
EPS Growth (5Y)

5-year EPS CAGR

18.1%0.0%7270.T

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

7270.T: 3PAH3.DE: 2
Metric7270.TPAH3.DEWinner
Debt/Equity

Debt to equity ratio

0.150.207270.T
Current Ratio

Current assets to current liabilities

2.4114.28PAH3.DE
Quick Ratio

Quick assets to current liabilities

1.8614.28PAH3.DE
Interest Coverage

EBIT to interest expense

2.99-59.187270.T
Beta

Stock volatility vs market

-0.100.947270.T
Summary
7270.T wins 2-1

Valuation

PAH3.DE

Profitability

Tie

Growth

7270.T

Balance Sheet

7270.T

PAH3.DE is more attractively valued. 7270.T demonstrates better growth. 7270.T has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons
7269.T 7269.T vs 7270.T 7270.T7270.T 7270.T vs STLA STLA7270.T 7270.T vs RIVN RIVN7269.T 7269.T vs PAH3.DE PAH3.DEPAH3.DE PAH3.DE vs STLA STLAPAH3.DE PAH3.DE vs RIVN RIVN
Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 7270.T and PAH3.DE with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison
Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 7270.T vs PAH3.DE on stockvs.app
<a href="https://stockvs.app/7270.T/vs/PAH3.DE" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 7270.T vs PAH3.DE on stockvs.app
</a>