Which stock is better: 0A1K.L or VFS?

The comparison between NIO Inc. (0A1K.L) and VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 0A1K.L vs VFS?

0A1K.L has a P/E ratio of -8.32, while VFS has a P/E ratio of -1.80. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 0A1K.L and VFS?

0A1K.L has a market cap of approximately 11.3B, while VFS has a market cap of approximately 7.3B.

0A1K.L vs VFS

Name: 0A1K.L Stock
Brand: NIO Inc.
Price: 4.88 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, 0A1K.L returned +7% while VFS lost 13%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

0A1K.L

NIO Inc.

$4.88

-4.7%(1M)

Market Cap11.3B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio-8.32

ROE-3.3%

P/B Ratio18.88

Dividend Yield0.0%

VFS

VinFast Auto Ltd.

$3.12

1.3%(1M)

Market Cap7.3B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio-1.80

ROE61.9%

P/B Ratio-1.01

Dividend Yield0.0%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

0A1K.L leads 5/8

0A1K.L

NIO Inc.

+7.3%

1Y Return

VFS

VinFast Auto Ltd.

-12.6%

1Y Return

0A1K.L

VFS

Short Term

1M-6M

-7.8%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+1.0%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

-68.6%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

0A1K.L: 4VFS: 1

Metric	0A1K.L	VFS	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	-8.32	-1.80	0A1K.L
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.77	1.99	0A1K.L
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	18.88	-1.01	VFS
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	-5.60	-2.89	0A1K.L
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	-32.10	-3.82	0A1K.L
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

0A1K.L: 5VFS: 1

Metric	0A1K.L	VFS	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	15.7%	-51.1%	0A1K.L
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	-8.2%	-84.8%	0A1K.L
Net Margin Net profit margin	-9.0%	-110.5%	0A1K.L
ROE Return on equity	-3.3%	61.9%	VFS
ROA Return on assets	-7.1%	-58.0%	0A1K.L
ROIC Return on invested capital	-14.7%	-173.4%	0A1K.L

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

0A1K.L: 1VFS: 3

Metric	0A1K.L	VFS	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	29.5%	105.4%	VFS
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	20.0%	86.6%	VFS
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	39.2%	45.9%	VFS
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	39.8%	-25.6%	0A1K.L
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

0A1K.L: 3VFS: 2

Metric	0A1K.L	VFS	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	6.12	-0.48	VFS
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	1.01	0.48	0A1K.L
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.90	0.27	0A1K.L
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	-9.67	-3.68	VFS
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.90	0.92	0A1K.L

Summary

0A1K.L wins 3-1

Valuation

0A1K.L

Profitability

0A1K.L

Growth

VFS

Balance Sheet

0A1K.L

0A1K.L is more attractively valued. 0A1K.L shows stronger profitability. VFS demonstrates better growth. 0A1K.L has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 0A1K.L and VFS with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 0A1K.L vs VFS on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/0A1K.L/vs/VFS" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 0A1K.L vs VFS on stockvs.app
</a>