Which stock is better: F or VFS?

The comparison between Ford Motor Company (F) and VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of F vs VFS?

F has a P/E ratio of -11.40, while VFS has a P/E ratio of -2.20. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between F and VFS?

F has a market cap of approximately 68.3B, while VFS has a market cap of approximately 8.2B.

F vs VFS

Name: F Stock
Brand: Ford Motor Company
Price: 17.44 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, F returned +71% while VFS lost 1%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

Ford Motor Company

$17.44

42.5%(1M)

Market Cap68.3B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

USA

P/E Ratio-11.40

ROE-14.7%

P/B Ratio1.86

Dividend Yield3.4%

VFS

VinFast Auto Ltd.

$3.49

-14.3%(1M)

Market Cap8.2B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio-2.20

ROE57.1%

P/B Ratio-1.24

Dividend Yield0.0%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

F leads 8/8

Ford Motor Company

+70.6%

1Y Return

VFS

VinFast Auto Ltd.

-1.1%

1Y Return

VFS

Short Term

1M-6M

+32.5%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+51.8%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+28.5%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

F: 2VFS: 3

Metric	F	VFS	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	-11.40	-2.20	F
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.36	2.36	F
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	1.86	-1.24	VFS
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	5.73	-3.14	VFS
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	20.79	-4.95	VFS
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

F: 5VFS: 1

Metric	F	VFS	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	9.2%	-42.5%	F
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	1.8%	-79.2%	F
Net Margin Net profit margin	-3.2%	-107.3%	F
ROE Return on equity	-14.7%	57.1%	VFS
ROA Return on assets	-2.2%	-53.4%	F
ROIC Return on invested capital	1.0%	-91.4%	F

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

F: 0VFS: 4

Metric	F	VFS	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	1.2%	105.4%	VFS
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	5.8%	86.6%	VFS
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	8.1%	45.9%	VFS
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	-241.1%	-25.6%	VFS
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

F: 3VFS: 2

Metric	F	VFS	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	4.20	-0.64	VFS
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	1.09	0.51	F
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.94	0.23	F
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	0.93	-3.21	F
Beta Stock volatility vs market	1.66	0.98	VFS

Summary

Valuation

VFS

Profitability

Growth

VFS

Balance Sheet

VFS is more attractively valued. F shows stronger profitability. VFS demonstrates better growth. F has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into F and VFS with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare F vs VFS on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/F/vs/VFS" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare F vs VFS on stockvs.app
</a>