Which stock is better: 92015.T or PAC?

The comparison between Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. (92015.T) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 92015.T vs PAC?

92015.T has a P/E ratio of 0.00, while PAC has a P/E ratio of 18.75. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 92015.T and PAC?

92015.T has a market cap of approximately 27.6B, while PAC has a market cap of approximately 10.6B.

92015.T vs PAC

Name: 92015.T Stock
Brand: Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.
Price: 64.17482 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, 92015.T returned -3% while PAC lost 8%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

92015.T

Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.

$64.17

0.1%(1M)

Market Cap27.6B

Industrials

Airlines, Airports & Air Services

P/E Ratio0.00

ROE0.0%

P/B Ratio0.00

Dividend Yield0.0%

PAC

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.

$203.90

1.1%(1M)

Market Cap10.6B

Industrials

Airlines, Airports & Air Services

P/E Ratio18.75

ROE39.8%

P/B Ratio4.26

Dividend Yield0.0%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

92015.T

Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.

-2.5%

1Y Return

PAC

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.

-8.2%

1Y Return

92015.T

PAC

Short Term

1M-6M

-1.4%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

-2.5%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+70.4%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

92015.T: 5PAC: 0

Metric	PAC	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	18.75	92015.T
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	5.32	92015.T
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	4.26	92015.T
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	60.30	92015.T
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	12.00	92015.T
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

92015.T: 0PAC: 6

Metric	92015.T	PAC	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	0.0%	55.2%	PAC
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	0.0%	43.5%	PAC
Net Margin Net profit margin	0.0%	24.1%	PAC
ROE Return on equity	0.0%	39.8%	PAC
ROA Return on assets	0.0%	7.2%	PAC
ROIC Return on invested capital	0.0%	10.7%	PAC

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

92015.T: 0PAC: 6

Metric	92015.T	PAC	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	0.0%	21.4%	PAC
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	0.0%	5.9%	PAC
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	0.0%	22.3%	PAC
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	0.0%	12.6%	PAC
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	3.7%	PAC
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	39.5%	PAC

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

92015.T: 1PAC: 4

Metric	92015.T	PAC	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.00	1.23	92015.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	0.00	0.74	PAC
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.00	0.74	PAC
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	0.00	4.51	PAC
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.43	0.24	PAC

Summary

PAC wins 3-1

Valuation

92015.T

Profitability

PAC

Growth

PAC

Balance Sheet

PAC

92015.T is more attractively valued. PAC shows stronger profitability. PAC demonstrates better growth. PAC has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 92015.T and PAC with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 92015.T vs PAC on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/92015.T/vs/PAC" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 92015.T vs PAC on stockvs.app
</a>