Which stock is better: 92015.T or UAL?

The comparison between Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. (92015.T) and United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 92015.T vs UAL?

92015.T has a P/E ratio of 0.00, while UAL has a P/E ratio of 8.96. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 92015.T and UAL?

92015.T has a market cap of approximately 27.6B, while UAL has a market cap of approximately 31.2B.

92015.T vs UAL

Name: 92015.T Stock
Brand: Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.
Price: 64.17482 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, UAL returned -2% while 92015.T lost 3%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

92015.T

Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.

$64.17

0.1%(1M)

Market Cap27.6B

Industrials

Airlines, Airports & Air Services

P/E Ratio0.00

ROE0.0%

P/B Ratio0.00

Dividend Yield0.0%

UAL

United Airlines Holdings, Inc.

$96.10

-9.6%(1M)

Market Cap31.2B

Industrials

Airlines, Airports & Air Services

USA

P/E Ratio8.96

ROE22.5%

P/B Ratio1.88

Dividend Yield0.0%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

UAL leads 5/8

92015.T

Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.

-2.5%

1Y Return

UAL

United Airlines Holdings, Inc.

-2.1%

1Y Return

92015.T

UAL

Short Term

1M-6M

-1.4%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

-2.5%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+109.4%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

92015.T: 5UAL: 0

Metric	UAL	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	8.96	92015.T
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.50	92015.T
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	1.88	92015.T
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	12.26	92015.T
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	6.55	92015.T
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

92015.T: 0UAL: 6

Metric	92015.T	UAL	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	0.0%	65.1%	UAL
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	0.0%	7.7%	UAL
Net Margin Net profit margin	0.0%	5.6%	UAL
ROE Return on equity	0.0%	22.5%	UAL
ROA Return on assets	0.0%	4.1%	UAL
ROIC Return on invested capital	0.0%	6.4%	UAL

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

92015.T: 0UAL: 5

Metric	92015.T	UAL	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	0.0%	3.5%	UAL
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	0.0%	9.5%	UAL
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	0.0%	30.9%	UAL
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	0.0%	8.1%	UAL
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	66.1%	UAL
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

92015.T: 2UAL: 3

Metric	92015.T	UAL	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.00	2.02	92015.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	0.00	0.78	UAL
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.00	0.72	UAL
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	0.00	3.83	UAL
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.43	1.30	92015.T

Summary

UAL wins 3-1

Valuation

92015.T

Profitability

UAL

Growth

UAL

Balance Sheet

UAL

92015.T is more attractively valued. UAL shows stronger profitability. UAL demonstrates better growth. UAL has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 92015.T and UAL with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 92015.T vs UAL on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/92015.T/vs/UAL" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 92015.T vs UAL on stockvs.app
</a>