Which stock is better: 92015.T or LUV?

The comparison between Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. (92015.T) and Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 92015.T vs LUV?

92015.T has a P/E ratio of 0.00, while LUV has a P/E ratio of 23.80. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 92015.T and LUV?

92015.T has a market cap of approximately 27.6B, while LUV has a market cap of approximately 19.3B.

92015.T vs LUV

Name: 92015.T Stock
Brand: Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.
Price: 64.17482 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, LUV returned +19% while 92015.T lost 3%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

92015.T

Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.

$64.17

0.1%(1M)

Market Cap27.6B

Industrials

Airlines, Airports & Air Services

P/E Ratio0.00

ROE0.0%

P/B Ratio0.00

Dividend Yield0.0%

LUV

Southwest Airlines Co.

$39.50

0.9%(1M)

Market Cap19.3B

Industrials

Airlines, Airports & Air Services

USA

P/E Ratio23.80

ROE11.3%

P/B Ratio2.76

Dividend Yield1.8%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

92015.T leads 5/8

92015.T

Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.

-2.5%

1Y Return

LUV

Southwest Airlines Co.

+18.7%

1Y Return

92015.T

LUV

Short Term

1M-6M

-1.4%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+7.1%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+9.8%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

92015.T: 4LUV: 1

Metric	LUV	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	23.80	92015.T
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.64	92015.T
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	2.76	92015.T
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	-31.12	LUV
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	8.43	92015.T
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

92015.T: 0LUV: 6

Metric	92015.T	LUV	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	0.0%	61.0%	LUV
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	0.0%	3.5%	LUV
Net Margin Net profit margin	0.0%	2.8%	LUV
ROE Return on equity	0.0%	11.3%	LUV
ROA Return on assets	0.0%	2.8%	LUV
ROIC Return on invested capital	0.0%	4.2%	LUV

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

92015.T: 1LUV: 4

Metric	92015.T	LUV	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	0.0%	2.1%	LUV
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	0.0%	5.6%	LUV
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	0.0%	25.4%	LUV
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	0.0%	5.3%	LUV
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	-3.2%	92015.T
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

92015.T: 2LUV: 3

Metric	92015.T	LUV	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.00	0.97	92015.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	0.00	0.49	LUV
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.00	0.42	LUV
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	0.00	6.09	LUV
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.43	1.16	92015.T

Summary

LUV wins 3-1

Valuation

92015.T

Profitability

LUV

Growth

LUV

Balance Sheet

LUV

92015.T is more attractively valued. LUV shows stronger profitability. LUV demonstrates better growth. LUV has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 92015.T and LUV with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 92015.T vs LUV on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/92015.T/vs/LUV" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 92015.T vs LUV on stockvs.app
</a>