Which stock is better: 7270.T or 7272.T?

The comparison between Subaru Corporation (7270.T) and Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. (7272.T) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 7270.T vs 7272.T?

7270.T has a P/E ratio of 18.76, while 7272.T has a P/E ratio of 47.65. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 7270.T and 7272.T?

7270.T has a market cap of approximately 11B, while 7272.T has a market cap of approximately 8B.

7270.T vs 7272.T

Name: 7270.T Stock
Brand: Subaru Corporation
Price: 15.33370872 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, 7272.T returned +18% while 7270.T lost 11%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

7270.T

Subaru Corporation

$15.33

3.9%(1M)

Market Cap11B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio18.76

ROE3.3%

P/B Ratio0.61

Dividend Yield4.7%

7272.T

Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.

$8.23

18.5%(1M)

Market Cap8B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio47.65

ROE2.3%

P/B Ratio1.09

Dividend Yield2.7%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

7272.T leads 8/8

7270.T

Subaru Corporation

-10.7%

1Y Return

7272.T

Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.

+17.9%

1Y Return

7270.T

7272.T

Short Term

1M-6M

+13.3%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+14.7%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+47.3%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

7270.T: 57272.T: 0

Metric	7270.T	7272.T	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	18.76	47.65	7270.T
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.37	0.48	7270.T
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	0.61	1.09	7270.T
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	14.11	18.32	7270.T
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	2.52	9.57	7270.T
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

7270.T: 47272.T: 2

Metric	7270.T	7272.T	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	15.0%	30.5%	7272.T
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	3.7%	4.6%	7272.T
Net Margin Net profit margin	1.9%	1.0%	7270.T
ROE Return on equity	3.3%	2.3%	7270.T
ROA Return on assets	1.7%	0.9%	7270.T
ROIC Return on invested capital	3.7%	1.5%	7270.T

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

7270.T: 57272.T: 1

Metric	7270.T	7272.T	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	2.1%	-1.6%	7270.T
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	8.2%	4.1%	7270.T
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	11.1%	11.5%	7272.T
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	-72.6%	-84.9%	7270.T
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	-21.7%	-54.0%	7270.T
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	4.7%	-20.0%	7270.T

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

7270.T: 47272.T: 1

Metric	7270.T	7272.T	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.14	1.02	7270.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	2.21	1.49	7270.T
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	1.68	1.03	7270.T
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	8.47	9.41	7272.T
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.06	0.42	7270.T

Summary

7270.T wins 4-0

Valuation

7270.T

Profitability

7270.T

Growth

7270.T

Balance Sheet

7270.T

7270.T is more attractively valued. 7270.T shows stronger profitability. 7270.T demonstrates better growth. 7270.T has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 7270.T and 7272.T with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 7270.T vs 7272.T on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/7270.T/vs/7272.T" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 7270.T vs 7272.T on stockvs.app
</a>