Which stock is better: 0QQ6.L or ABBV?

The comparison between Roche Holding AG (0QQ6.L) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 0QQ6.L vs ABBV?

0QQ6.L has a P/E ratio of 22.73, while ABBV has a P/E ratio of 73.56. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 0QQ6.L and ABBV?

0QQ6.L has a market cap of approximately 387.9B, while ABBV has a market cap of approximately 452.9B.

0QQ6.L vs ABBV

Name: 0QQ6.L Stock
Brand: Roche Holding AG
Price: 454.096076464 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, 0QQ6.L returned +30% while ABBV gained 20%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

0QQ6.L

Roche Holding AG

$454.10

1.9%(1M)

Market Cap387.9B

Healthcare

Drug Manufacturers - General

P/E Ratio22.73

ROE37.1%

P/B Ratio8.64

Dividend Yield2.8%

ABBV

AbbVie Inc.

$256.34

5.1%(1M)

Market Cap452.9B

Healthcare

Drug Manufacturers - General

USA

P/E Ratio73.56

ROE-136.5%

P/B Ratio-77.91

Dividend Yield2.6%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

ABBV leads 6/8

0QQ6.L

Roche Holding AG

+30.4%

1Y Return

ABBV

AbbVie Inc.

+20.3%

1Y Return

0QQ6.L

ABBV

Short Term

1M-6M

+9.2%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+20.2%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+169.1%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

0QQ6.L: 4ABBV: 1

Metric	0QQ6.L	ABBV	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	22.73	73.56	0QQ6.L
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	4.56	7.16	0QQ6.L
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	8.64	-77.91	ABBV
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	18.83	23.44	0QQ6.L
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	14.46	24.69	0QQ6.L
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

0QQ6.L: 6ABBV: 0

Metric	0QQ6.L	ABBV	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	73.3%	71.5%	0QQ6.L
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	31.9%	29.3%	0QQ6.L
Net Margin Net profit margin	20.3%	9.8%	0QQ6.L
ROE Return on equity	37.1%	-136.5%	0QQ6.L
ROA Return on assets	12.6%	4.7%	0QQ6.L
ROIC Return on invested capital	20.8%	13.5%	0QQ6.L

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

0QQ6.L: 3ABBV: 3

Metric	0QQ6.L	ABBV	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	-1.4%	8.6%	ABBV
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	-0.9%	1.8%	ABBV
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	1.1%	6.0%	ABBV
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	55.9%	-0.8%	0QQ6.L
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	1.1%	-29.0%	0QQ6.L
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	-0.6%	-2.7%	0QQ6.L

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

0QQ6.L: 3ABBV: 2

Metric	0QQ6.L	ABBV	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.97	-11.93	ABBV
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	1.23	0.81	0QQ6.L
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.95	0.69	0QQ6.L
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	14.07	6.47	0QQ6.L
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.35	0.28	ABBV

Summary

0QQ6.L wins 3-0

Valuation

0QQ6.L

Profitability

0QQ6.L

Growth

Tie

Balance Sheet

0QQ6.L

0QQ6.L is more attractively valued. 0QQ6.L shows stronger profitability. 0QQ6.L has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 0QQ6.L and ABBV with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 0QQ6.L vs ABBV on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/0QQ6.L/vs/ABBV" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 0QQ6.L vs ABBV on stockvs.app
</a>