Which stock is better: 92015.T or LTM?

The comparison between Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. (92015.T) and LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (LTM) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 92015.T vs LTM?

92015.T has a P/E ratio of 0.00, while LTM has a P/E ratio of 8.78. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 92015.T and LTM?

92015.T has a market cap of approximately 27.6B, while LTM has a market cap of approximately 13.6B.

92015.T vs LTM

Name: 92015.T Stock
Brand: Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.
Price: 64.17482 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, LTM returned +7% while 92015.T lost 3%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

92015.T

Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.

$64.17

0.1%(1M)

Market Cap27.6B

Industrials

Airlines, Airports & Air Services

P/E Ratio0.00

ROE0.0%

P/B Ratio0.00

Dividend Yield0.0%

LTM

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

$47.47

-5.2%(1M)

Market Cap13.6B

Industrials

Airlines, Airports & Air Services

P/E Ratio8.78

ROE98.0%

P/B Ratio6.80

Dividend Yield3.0%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

92015.T

Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.

-2.5%

1Y Return

LTM

LATAM Airlines Group S.A.

+7.2%

1Y Return

92015.T

LTM

Short Term

1M-6M

-1.4%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

-2.4%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+92.2%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

92015.T: 5LTM: 0

Metric	LTM	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	8.78	92015.T
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.86	92015.T
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	6.80	92015.T
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	6.99	92015.T
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	5.36	92015.T
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

92015.T: 0LTM: 6

Metric	92015.T	LTM	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	0.0%	27.0%	LTM
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	0.0%	15.1%	LTM
Net Margin Net profit margin	0.0%	9.9%	LTM
ROE Return on equity	0.0%	98.0%	LTM
ROA Return on assets	0.0%	8.0%	LTM
ROIC Return on invested capital	0.0%	17.4%	LTM

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

92015.T: 1LTM: 4

Metric	92015.T	LTM	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	0.0%	11.2%	LTM
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	0.0%	15.1%	LTM
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	0.0%	29.5%	LTM
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	0.0%	56.3%	LTM
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	-43.1%	92015.T
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

92015.T: 2LTM: 3

Metric	92015.T	LTM	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.00	4.51	92015.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	0.00	0.67	LTM
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.00	0.60	LTM
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	0.00	3.81	LTM
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.43	0.84	92015.T

Summary

LTM wins 3-1

Valuation

92015.T

Profitability

LTM

Growth

LTM

Balance Sheet

LTM

92015.T is more attractively valued. LTM shows stronger profitability. LTM demonstrates better growth. LTM has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 92015.T and LTM with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 92015.T vs LTM on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/92015.T/vs/LTM" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 92015.T vs LTM on stockvs.app
</a>