Which stock is better: 7261.T or LOTWW?

The comparison between Mazda Motor Corporation (7261.T) and Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants (LOTWW) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 7261.T vs LOTWW?

7261.T has a P/E ratio of 6.61, while LOTWW has a P/E ratio of -0.86. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 7261.T and LOTWW?

7261.T has a market cap of approximately 4.4B, while LOTWW has a market cap of approximately 330.5M.

7261.T vs LOTWW

Name: 7261.T Stock
Brand: Mazda Motor Corporation
Price: 7.00884349 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, 7261.T returned -0% while LOTWW lost 49%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

7261.T

Mazda Motor Corporation

$7.01

-4.0%(1M)

Market Cap4.4B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio6.61

ROE5.8%

P/B Ratio0.37

Dividend Yield4.9%

LOTWW

Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants

$0.04

-17.6%(1M)

Market Cap330.5M

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio-0.86

ROE34.7%

P/B Ratio-0.28

Dividend Yield0.0%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

7261.T leads 8/8

7261.T

Mazda Motor Corporation

-0.2%

1Y Return

LOTWW

Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants

-48.5%

1Y Return

7261.T

LOTWW

Short Term

1M-6M

-1.9%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

-5.5%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

-18.2%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

7261.T: 1LOTWW: 4

Metric	7261.T	LOTWW	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	6.61	-0.86	LOTWW
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.14	0.53	7261.T
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	0.37	-0.28	LOTWW
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	50.89	0.00	LOTWW
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	1.33	-6.61	LOTWW
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

7261.T: 5LOTWW: 1

Metric	7261.T	LOTWW	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	19.0%	8.7%	7261.T
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	2.6%	-52.8%	7261.T
Net Margin Net profit margin	2.1%	-62.3%	7261.T
ROE Return on equity	5.8%	34.7%	LOTWW
ROA Return on assets	2.4%	-22.7%	7261.T
ROIC Return on invested capital	3.3%	-42.2%	7261.T

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

7261.T: 2LOTWW: 3

Metric	7261.T	LOTWW	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	-2.0%	-43.8%	7261.T
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	8.7%	278.7%	LOTWW
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	11.3%	0.0%	7261.T
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	-69.3%	58.1%	LOTWW
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	-37.4%	0.0%	LOTWW
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

7261.T: 3LOTWW: 2

Metric	7261.T	LOTWW	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.45	-1.36	LOTWW
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	1.47	0.32	7261.T
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	1.01	0.25	7261.T
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	10.73	-5.78	7261.T
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.61	0.44	LOTWW

Summary

Valuation

LOTWW

Profitability

7261.T

Growth

LOTWW

Balance Sheet

7261.T

LOTWW is more attractively valued. 7261.T shows stronger profitability. LOTWW demonstrates better growth. 7261.T has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 7261.T and LOTWW with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 7261.T vs LOTWW on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/7261.T/vs/LOTWW" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 7261.T vs LOTWW on stockvs.app
</a>