Which stock is better: 7202.T or 7270.T?

The comparison between Isuzu Motors Limited (7202.T) and Subaru Corporation (7270.T) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 7202.T vs 7270.T?

7202.T has a P/E ratio of 12.03, while 7270.T has a P/E ratio of 20.31. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 7202.T and 7270.T?

7202.T has a market cap of approximately 9.8B, while 7270.T has a market cap of approximately 11.2B.

7202.T vs 7270.T

Name: 7202.T Stock
Brand: Isuzu Motors Limited
Price: 14.3039307 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, 7202.T returned +18% while 7270.T gained 1%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

7202.T

Isuzu Motors Limited

$14.30

1.9%(1M)

Market Cap9.8B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio12.03

ROE9.4%

P/B Ratio1.05

Dividend Yield4.0%

7270.T

Subaru Corporation

$15.60

3.8%(1M)

Market Cap11.2B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio20.31

ROE3.3%

P/B Ratio0.64

Dividend Yield4.6%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

7202.T leads 7/8

7202.T

Isuzu Motors Limited

+17.9%

1Y Return

7270.T

Subaru Corporation

+0.6%

1Y Return

7202.T

7270.T

Short Term

1M-6M

-3.3%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+6.1%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+57.8%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

7202.T: 17270.T: 4

Metric	7202.T	7270.T	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	12.03	20.31	7202.T
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.46	0.38	7270.T
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	1.05	0.64	7270.T
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	19.03	14.64	7270.T
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	5.36	2.98	7270.T
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

7202.T: 67270.T: 0

Metric	7202.T	7270.T	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	19.1%	15.0%	7202.T
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	5.7%	3.7%	7202.T
Net Margin Net profit margin	3.9%	1.9%	7202.T
ROE Return on equity	9.4%	3.3%	7202.T
ROA Return on assets	3.7%	1.7%	7202.T
ROIC Return on invested capital	5.6%	3.7%	7202.T

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

7202.T: 57270.T: 1

Metric	7202.T	7270.T	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	8.4%	2.1%	7202.T
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	2.9%	8.2%	7270.T
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	12.8%	11.1%	7202.T
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	5.5%	-72.6%	7202.T
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	-0.5%	-21.7%	7202.T
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	27.2%	4.7%	7202.T

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

7202.T: 17270.T: 4

Metric	7202.T	7270.T	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.58	0.14	7270.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	1.72	2.21	7270.T
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	1.10	1.68	7270.T
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	23.90	8.47	7202.T
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.44	0.06	7270.T

Summary

Valuation

7270.T

Profitability

7202.T

Growth

7202.T

Balance Sheet

7270.T

7270.T is more attractively valued. 7202.T shows stronger profitability. 7202.T demonstrates better growth. 7270.T has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 7202.T and 7270.T with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 7202.T vs 7270.T on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/7202.T/vs/7270.T" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 7202.T vs 7270.T on stockvs.app
</a>