VS
stockvs
Go to ScreenerHub
0A1K.L

0A1K.L vs VFSWW

VFSWW

In the past 12 months, VFSWW returned +10% while 0A1K.L lost 50%.

ValuationGrowthProfitabilityBalance SheetPerformance
0A1K.L
0A1K.L

NIO Inc.

$3.42
-5.0%(1M)
Market Cap8.1B
Consumer Cyclical
Auto - Manufacturers
CN
P/E Ratio-11.73
ROE-112.4%
P/B Ratio14.06
Dividend Yield0.0%
VFSWW
VFSWW

VinFast Auto Ltd.

$0.24
27.0%(1M)
Market Cap7.5B
Consumer Cyclical
Auto - Manufacturers
VN
P/E Ratio-1.75
ROE61.7%
P/B Ratio-0.99
Dividend Yield0.0%
Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

VFSWW leads 7/8
0A1K.L

0A1K.L

NIO Inc.

-49.6%

1Y Return

VFSWW

VFSWW

VinFast Auto Ltd.

+10.0%

1Y Return

0A1K.L
0A1K.L
VFSWW
VFSWW

Short Term

1M-6M

VFSWW
-13.0%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

VFSWW
+35.0%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

0A1K.L
-81.1%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

0A1K.L: 3VFSWW: 2
Metric0A1K.LVFSWWWinner
P/E Ratio

Price to earnings ratio

-11.73-1.750A1K.L
Forward P/E

Forward price to earnings ratio

0.000.00Tie
P/S Ratio

Price to sales ratio

0.481.940A1K.L
P/B Ratio

Price to book ratio

14.06-0.99VFSWW
P/FCF Ratio

Price to free cash flow ratio

0.00-2.82VFSWW
EV/EBITDA

Enterprise value to EBITDA

-15.29-4.100A1K.L
PEG Ratio

Price/earnings to growth ratio

0.000.00Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

0A1K.L: 5VFSWW: 1
Metric0A1K.LVFSWWWinner
Gross Margin

Gross profit margin

17.4%-51.1%0A1K.L
Operating Margin

Operating profit margin

-3.2%-84.8%0A1K.L
Net Margin

Net profit margin

-4.0%-110.5%0A1K.L
ROE

Return on equity

-112.4%61.7%VFSWW
ROA

Return on assets

-3.3%-58.0%0A1K.L
ROIC

Return on invested capital

-6.2%-113.7%0A1K.L

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

0A1K.L: 1VFSWW: 3
Metric0A1K.LVFSWWWinner
Revenue Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year revenue growth

29.5%105.4%VFSWW
Revenue Growth (3Y)

3-year revenue CAGR

20.0%86.6%VFSWW
Revenue Growth (5Y)

5-year revenue CAGR

39.2%45.9%VFSWW
EPS Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year EPS growth

39.8%-25.6%0A1K.L
EPS Growth (3Y)

3-year EPS CAGR

0.0%0.0%Tie
EPS Growth (5Y)

5-year EPS CAGR

0.0%0.0%Tie

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

0A1K.L: 2VFSWW: 3
Metric0A1K.LVFSWWWinner
Debt/Equity

Debt to equity ratio

7.13-0.61VFSWW
Current Ratio

Current assets to current liabilities

1.020.480A1K.L
Quick Ratio

Quick assets to current liabilities

0.890.270A1K.L
Interest Coverage

EBIT to interest expense

-4.18-3.68VFSWW
Beta

Stock volatility vs market

0.960.00VFSWW
Summary

Valuation

0A1K.L

Profitability

0A1K.L

Growth

VFSWW

Balance Sheet

VFSWW

0A1K.L is more attractively valued. 0A1K.L shows stronger profitability. VFSWW demonstrates better growth. VFSWW has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons
0A1K.L 0A1K.L vs STLA STLA0A1K.L 0A1K.L vs 7270.T 7270.T0A1K.L 0A1K.L vs 7272.T 7272.TSTLA STLA vs VFSWW VFSWW7270.T 7270.T vs VFSWW VFSWW7272.T 7272.T vs VFSWW VFSWW
Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 0A1K.L and VFSWW with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison
Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 0A1K.L vs VFSWW on stockvs.app
<a href="https://stockvs.app/0A1K.L/vs/VFSWW" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 0A1K.L vs VFSWW on stockvs.app
</a>