Which stock is better: MU or NVDA?

The comparison between Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of MU vs NVDA?

MU has a P/E ratio of 11.67, while NVDA has a P/E ratio of 26.93. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between MU and NVDA?

MU has a market cap of approximately 994.3B, while NVDA has a market cap of approximately 5.2T.

MU vs NVDA

Name: MU Stock
Brand: Micron Technology, Inc.
Price: 878.84 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, MU returned +334% while NVDA gained 18%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

Micron Technology, Inc.

$878.84

-5.1%(1M)

Market Cap994.3B

Technology

Semiconductors

USA

P/E Ratio11.67

ROE91.8%

P/B Ratio7.18

Dividend Yield0.1%

NVDA

NVIDIA Corporation

$214.13

0.1%(1M)

Market Cap5.2T

Technology

Semiconductors

USA

P/E Ratio26.93

ROE110.1%

P/B Ratio22.62

Dividend Yield0.2%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

MU leads 5/8

Micron Technology, Inc.

+333.9%

1Y Return

NVDA

NVIDIA Corporation

+17.8%

1Y Return

NVDA

Short Term

1M-6M

+30.0%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+270.9%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+4728.3%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

MU: 5NVDA: 0

Metric	MU	NVDA	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	11.67	26.93	MU
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	7.47	17.03	MU
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	7.18	22.62	MU
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	18.79	40.63	MU
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	8.78	22.13	MU
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

MU: 3NVDA: 3

Metric	MU	NVDA	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	80.7%	74.7%	MU
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	75.0%	65.2%	MU
Net Margin Net profit margin	63.8%	63.7%	MU
ROE Return on equity	91.8%	110.1%	NVDA
ROA Return on assets	43.4%	60.2%	NVDA
ROIC Return on invested capital	50.4%	59.5%	NVDA

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

MU: 3NVDA: 3

Metric	MU	NVDA	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	256.3%	65.5%	MU
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	104.6%	100.0%	MU
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	36.9%	66.9%	NVDA
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	879.3%	66.7%	MU
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	206.6%	NVDA
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	70.6%	95.9%	NVDA

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

MU: 2NVDA: 3

Metric	MU	NVDA	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.04	0.17	MU
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	3.31	4.59	NVDA
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	2.94	3.86	NVDA
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	942.52	426.74	MU
Beta Stock volatility vs market	2.23	2.22	NVDA

Summary

Valuation

Profitability

Tie

Growth

Tie

Balance Sheet

NVDA

MU is more attractively valued. NVDA has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into MU and NVDA with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare MU vs NVDA on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/MU/vs/NVDA" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare MU vs NVDA on stockvs.app
</a>