Which stock is better: LRCX or MU?

The comparison between Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of LRCX vs MU?

LRCX has a P/E ratio of 49.68, while MU has a P/E ratio of 21.26. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between LRCX and MU?

LRCX has a market cap of approximately 366B, while MU has a market cap of approximately 1.1T.

LRCX vs MU

Name: LRCX Stock
Brand: Lam Research Corporation
Price: 292.66 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, MU returned +707% while LRCX gained 199%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

LRCX

Lam Research Corporation

$292.66

-0.7%(1M)

Market Cap366B

Technology

Semiconductors

USA

P/E Ratio49.68

ROE67.0%

P/B Ratio28.95

Dividend Yield0.4%

Micron Technology, Inc.

$958.16

15.5%(1M)

Market Cap1.1T

Technology

Semiconductors

USA

P/E Ratio21.26

ROE70.5%

P/B Ratio10.67

Dividend Yield0.1%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

MU leads 8/8

LRCX

Lam Research Corporation

+199.4%

1Y Return

Micron Technology, Inc.

+707.1%

1Y Return

LRCX

Short Term

1M-6M

+52.2%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+471.4%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+2664.7%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

LRCX: 0MU: 5

Metric	LRCX	MU	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	49.68	21.26	MU
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	15.48	11.92	MU
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	28.95	10.67	MU
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	73.54	41.11	MU
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	41.23	15.52	MU
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

LRCX: 0MU: 6

Metric	LRCX	MU	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	50.5%	72.6%	MU
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	35.3%	65.7%	MU
Net Margin Net profit margin	31.3%	55.9%	MU
ROE Return on equity	67.0%	70.5%	MU
ROA Return on assets	30.9%	37.6%	MU
ROIC Return on invested capital	40.8%	44.0%	MU

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

LRCX: 2MU: 4

Metric	LRCX	MU	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	26.0%	48.9%	MU
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	10.1%	6.7%	LRCX
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	9.7%	11.8%	MU
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	38.8%	984.3%	MU
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	20.2%	-0.7%	LRCX
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	16.4%	26.2%	MU

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

LRCX: 1MU: 4

Metric	LRCX	MU	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.33	0.06	MU
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	2.63	3.42	MU
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	1.91	2.98	MU
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	65.98	258.01	MU
Beta Stock volatility vs market	1.87	2.21	LRCX

Summary

MU wins 4-0

Valuation

Profitability

Growth

Balance Sheet

MU is more attractively valued. MU shows stronger profitability. MU demonstrates better growth. MU has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into LRCX and MU with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare LRCX vs MU on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/LRCX/vs/MU" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare LRCX vs MU on stockvs.app
</a>