Which stock is better: ASML or MU?

The comparison between ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of ASML vs MU?

ASML has a P/E ratio of 59.37, while MU has a P/E ratio of 18.95. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between ASML and MU?

ASML has a market cap of approximately 670.2B, while MU has a market cap of approximately 977.4B.

ASML vs MU

Name: ASML Stock
Brand: ASML Holding N.V.
Price: 1739.02 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, MU returned +664% while ASML gained 142%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

ASML

ASML Holding N.V.

$1,739.02

-9.9%(1M)

Market Cap670.2B

Technology

Semiconductors

P/E Ratio59.37

ROE52.4%

P/B Ratio28.44

Dividend Yield0.5%

Micron Technology, Inc.

$865.46

-28.6%(1M)

Market Cap977.4B

Technology

Semiconductors

USA

P/E Ratio18.95

ROE70.6%

P/B Ratio9.51

Dividend Yield0.1%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

MU leads 7/8

ASML

ASML Holding N.V.

+141.6%

1Y Return

Micron Technology, Inc.

+664.3%

1Y Return

ASML

Short Term

1M-6M

+67.2%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+433.8%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+2851.4%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

ASML: 0MU: 5

Metric	ASML	MU	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	59.37	18.95	MU
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	17.58	10.62	MU
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	28.44	9.51	MU
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	66.14	36.63	MU
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	43.35	20.91	MU
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

ASML: 0MU: 6

Metric	ASML	MU	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	52.6%	72.6%	MU
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	34.8%	65.8%	MU
Net Margin Net profit margin	29.7%	55.9%	MU
ROE Return on equity	52.4%	70.6%	MU
ROA Return on assets	21.2%	37.6%	MU
ROIC Return on invested capital	36.9%	44.0%	MU

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

ASML: 3MU: 3

Metric	ASML	MU	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	15.6%	48.9%	MU
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	15.6%	6.7%	ASML
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	18.5%	11.8%	ASML
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	28.4%	984.3%	MU
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	21.4%	-0.7%	ASML
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	25.6%	26.2%	MU

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

ASML: 1MU: 4

Metric	ASML	MU	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.13	0.06	MU
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	1.36	3.42	MU
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.78	2.98	MU
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	0.00	258.11	MU
Beta Stock volatility vs market	1.39	2.14	ASML

Summary

MU wins 3-0

Valuation

Profitability

Growth

Tie

Balance Sheet

MU is more attractively valued. MU shows stronger profitability. MU has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into ASML and MU with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare ASML vs MU on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/ASML/vs/MU" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare ASML vs MU on stockvs.app
</a>