VS
stockvs
Go to ScreenerHub
ASML

ASML vs MU

MU

In the past 12 months, MU returned +328% while ASML gained 88%.

ASML
ASML

ASML Holding N.V.

$1,375.56
-3.1%(1M)
Market Cap530.2B
Technology
Semiconductors
NL
P/E Ratio47.44
ROE52.1%
P/B Ratio23.24
Dividend Yield0.6%
MU
MU

Micron Technology, Inc.

$441.80
10.5%(1M)
Market Cap497.2B
Technology
Semiconductors
USA
P/E Ratio38.08
ROE22.4%
P/B Ratio7.71
Dividend Yield0.1%
Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

MU leads 8/8
ASML

ASML

ASML Holding N.V.

+88.3%

1Y Return

MU

MU

Micron Technology, Inc.

+328.5%

1Y Return

ASML
ASML
MU
MU

Short Term

1M-6M

MU
+92.9%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

MU
+184.3%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

MU
+1695.2%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

ASML: 0MU: 5
MetricASMLMUWinner
P/E Ratio

Price to earnings ratio

47.4438.08MU
Forward P/E

Forward price to earnings ratio

0.000.00Tie
P/S Ratio

Price to sales ratio

14.0110.72MU
P/B Ratio

Price to book ratio

23.247.71MU
P/FCF Ratio

Price to free cash flow ratio

41.2838.08MU
EV/EBITDA

Enterprise value to EBITDA

36.5321.32MU
PEG Ratio

Price/earnings to growth ratio

0.000.00Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

ASML: 6MU: 0
MetricASMLMUWinner
Gross Margin

Gross profit margin

52.8%45.3%ASML
Operating Margin

Operating profit margin

34.6%32.7%ASML
Net Margin

Net profit margin

29.4%28.1%ASML
ROE

Return on equity

52.1%22.4%ASML
ROA

Return on assets

19.0%13.9%ASML
ROIC

Return on invested capital

35.5%16.3%ASML

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

ASML: 3MU: 3
MetricASMLMUWinner
Revenue Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year revenue growth

15.6%48.9%MU
Revenue Growth (3Y)

3-year revenue CAGR

15.6%6.7%ASML
Revenue Growth (5Y)

5-year revenue CAGR

18.5%11.8%ASML
EPS Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year EPS growth

28.4%984.3%MU
EPS Growth (3Y)

3-year EPS CAGR

21.4%-0.7%ASML
EPS Growth (5Y)

5-year EPS CAGR

25.6%26.2%MU

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

ASML: 2MU: 3
MetricASMLMUWinner
Debt/Equity

Debt to equity ratio

0.140.21ASML
Current Ratio

Current assets to current liabilities

1.262.46MU
Quick Ratio

Quick assets to current liabilities

0.791.78MU
Interest Coverage

EBIT to interest expense

0.0031.96MU
Beta

Stock volatility vs market

1.431.54ASML
Summary
MU wins 2-1

Valuation

MU

Profitability

ASML

Growth

Tie

Balance Sheet

MU

MU is more attractively valued. ASML shows stronger profitability. MU has a stronger balance sheet.

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into ASML and MU with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison
Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

<a href="https://stockvs.app/ASML/vs/MU" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare ASML vs MU on stockvs.app
</a>