Which stock is better: HOG or LOTWW?

The comparison between Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) and Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants (LOTWW) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of HOG vs LOTWW?

HOG has a P/E ratio of 16.12, while LOTWW has a P/E ratio of -0.86. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between HOG and LOTWW?

HOG has a market cap of approximately 2.8B, while LOTWW has a market cap of approximately 330.5M.

HOG vs LOTWW

Name: HOG Stock
Brand: Harley-Davidson, Inc.
Price: 26.73 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, HOG returned +0% while LOTWW lost 49%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

HOG

Harley-Davidson, Inc.

$26.73

3.1%(1M)

Market Cap2.8B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

USA

P/E Ratio16.12

ROE6.3%

P/B Ratio0.93

Dividend Yield2.8%

LOTWW

Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants

$0.04

-17.6%(1M)

Market Cap330.5M

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio-0.86

ROE34.7%

P/B Ratio-0.28

Dividend Yield0.0%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

HOG leads 8/8

HOG

Harley-Davidson, Inc.

+0.2%

1Y Return

LOTWW

Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants

-48.5%

1Y Return

HOG

LOTWW

Short Term

1M-6M

+5.8%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+15.3%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

-29.5%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

HOG: 1LOTWW: 4

Metric	HOG	LOTWW	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	16.12	-0.86	LOTWW
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.68	0.53	LOTWW
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	0.93	-0.28	LOTWW
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	-20.93	0.00	HOG
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	9.13	-6.61	LOTWW
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

HOG: 5LOTWW: 1

Metric	HOG	LOTWW	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	23.9%	8.7%	HOG
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	5.1%	-52.8%	HOG
Net Margin Net profit margin	4.9%	-62.3%	HOG
ROE Return on equity	6.3%	34.7%	LOTWW
ROA Return on assets	2.8%	-22.7%	HOG
ROIC Return on invested capital	2.4%	-42.2%	HOG

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

HOG: 3LOTWW: 3

Metric	HOG	LOTWW	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	-13.8%	-43.8%	HOG
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	-8.1%	278.7%	LOTWW
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	2.0%	0.0%	HOG
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	-19.2%	58.1%	LOTWW
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	-17.6%	0.0%	LOTWW
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	219.1%	0.0%	HOG

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

HOG: 3LOTWW: 2

Metric	HOG	LOTWW	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.74	-1.36	LOTWW
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	1.90	0.32	HOG
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	1.70	0.25	HOG
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	19.32	-5.78	HOG
Beta Stock volatility vs market	1.32	0.44	LOTWW

Summary

HOG wins 2-1

Valuation

LOTWW

Profitability

HOG

Growth

Tie

Balance Sheet

HOG

LOTWW is more attractively valued. HOG shows stronger profitability. HOG has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into HOG and LOTWW with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare HOG vs LOTWW on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/HOG/vs/LOTWW" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare HOG vs LOTWW on stockvs.app
</a>