Which stock is better: 7261.T or HOG?

The comparison between Mazda Motor Corporation (7261.T) and Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 7261.T vs HOG?

7261.T has a P/E ratio of 6.61, while HOG has a P/E ratio of 16.12. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 7261.T and HOG?

7261.T has a market cap of approximately 4.5B, while HOG has a market cap of approximately 2.8B.

7261.T vs HOG

Name: 7261.T Stock
Brand: Mazda Motor Corporation
Price: 7.09184 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, 7261.T returned +2% while HOG lost 0%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

7261.T

Mazda Motor Corporation

$7.09

-3.2%(1M)

Market Cap4.5B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio6.61

ROE5.8%

P/B Ratio0.37

Dividend Yield4.9%

HOG

Harley-Davidson, Inc.

$26.76

-0.3%(1M)

Market Cap2.8B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

USA

P/E Ratio16.12

ROE6.3%

P/B Ratio0.93

Dividend Yield2.8%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

HOG leads 5/8

7261.T

Mazda Motor Corporation

+2.5%

1Y Return

HOG

Harley-Davidson, Inc.

-0.1%

1Y Return

7261.T

HOG

Short Term

1M-6M

+6.3%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+15.2%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

-18.6%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

7261.T: 4HOG: 1

Metric	7261.T	HOG	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	6.61	16.12	7261.T
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.14	0.68	7261.T
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	0.37	0.93	7261.T
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	50.89	-20.93	HOG
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	1.33	9.13	7261.T
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

7261.T: 1HOG: 5

Metric	7261.T	HOG	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	19.0%	23.9%	HOG
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	2.6%	5.1%	HOG
Net Margin Net profit margin	2.1%	4.9%	HOG
ROE Return on equity	5.8%	6.3%	HOG
ROA Return on assets	2.4%	2.8%	HOG
ROIC Return on invested capital	3.3%	2.4%	7261.T

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

7261.T: 3HOG: 3

Metric	7261.T	HOG	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	-2.0%	-13.8%	7261.T
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	8.7%	-8.1%	7261.T
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	11.3%	2.0%	7261.T
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	-69.3%	-19.2%	HOG
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	-37.4%	-17.6%	HOG
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	219.1%	HOG

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

7261.T: 2HOG: 3

Metric	7261.T	HOG	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.45	0.74	7261.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	1.47	1.90	HOG
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	1.01	1.70	HOG
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	10.73	19.32	HOG
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.61	1.32	7261.T

Summary

HOG wins 2-1

Valuation

7261.T

Profitability

HOG

Growth

Tie

Balance Sheet

HOG

7261.T is more attractively valued. HOG shows stronger profitability. HOG has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 7261.T and HOG with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 7261.T vs HOG on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/7261.T/vs/HOG" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 7261.T vs HOG on stockvs.app
</a>