Which stock is better: 92015.T or RY4C.DE?

The comparison between Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. (92015.T) and Ryanair Holdings plc (RY4C.DE) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 92015.T vs RY4C.DE?

92015.T has a P/E ratio of 0.00, while RY4C.DE has a P/E ratio of 12.73. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 92015.T and RY4C.DE?

92015.T has a market cap of approximately 27.6B, while RY4C.DE has a market cap of approximately 26.7B.

92015.T vs RY4C.DE

Name: 92015.T Stock
Brand: Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.
Price: 64.17482 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, 92015.T returned -3% while RY4C.DE lost 7%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

92015.T

Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.

$64.17

0.1%(1M)

Market Cap27.6B

Industrials

Airlines, Airports & Air Services

P/E Ratio0.00

ROE0.0%

P/B Ratio0.00

Dividend Yield0.0%

RY4C.DE

Ryanair Holdings plc

$25.74

1.7%(1M)

Market Cap26.7B

Industrials

Airlines, Airports & Air Services

P/E Ratio12.73

ROE20.3%

P/B Ratio2.50

Dividend Yield1.7%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

92015.T

Japan Airlines Co., Ltd.

-2.5%

1Y Return

RY4C.DE

Ryanair Holdings plc

-7.2%

1Y Return

92015.T

RY4C.DE

Short Term

1M-6M

-1.4%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

-2.5%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+60.0%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

92015.T: 5RY4C.DE: 0

Metric	RY4C.DE	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	12.73	92015.T
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	1.51	92015.T
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	2.50	92015.T
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	13.91	92015.T
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	5.94	92015.T
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

92015.T: 0RY4C.DE: 6

Metric	92015.T	RY4C.DE	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	0.0%	18.6%	RY4C.DE
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	0.0%	13.1%	RY4C.DE
Net Margin Net profit margin	0.0%	12.1%	RY4C.DE
ROE Return on equity	0.0%	20.3%	RY4C.DE
ROA Return on assets	0.0%	10.4%	RY4C.DE
ROIC Return on invested capital	0.0%	17.8%	RY4C.DE

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

92015.T: 0RY4C.DE: 5

Metric	92015.T	RY4C.DE	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	0.0%	11.4%	RY4C.DE
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	0.0%	13.0%	RY4C.DE
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	0.0%	56.9%	RY4C.DE
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	0.0%	40.7%	RY4C.DE
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	21.1%	RY4C.DE
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

92015.T: 2RY4C.DE: 2

Metric	92015.T	RY4C.DE	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.00	0.02	92015.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	0.00	0.79	RY4C.DE
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.00	0.79	RY4C.DE
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	0.00	0.00	Tie
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.43	0.98	92015.T

Summary

RY4C.DE wins 2-1

Valuation

92015.T

Profitability

RY4C.DE

Growth

RY4C.DE

Balance Sheet

Tie

92015.T is more attractively valued. RY4C.DE shows stronger profitability. RY4C.DE demonstrates better growth.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 92015.T and RY4C.DE with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 92015.T vs RY4C.DE on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/92015.T/vs/RY4C.DE" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 92015.T vs RY4C.DE on stockvs.app
</a>