Which stock is better: 7270.T or HOG?

The comparison between Subaru Corporation (7270.T) and Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 7270.T vs HOG?

7270.T has a P/E ratio of 22.25, while HOG has a P/E ratio of 16.12. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 7270.T and HOG?

7270.T has a market cap of approximately 11.9B, while HOG has a market cap of approximately 2.8B.

7270.T vs HOG

Name: 7270.T Stock
Brand: Subaru Corporation
Price: 16.735476 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, HOG returned -0% while 7270.T lost 16%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

7270.T

Subaru Corporation

$16.74

0.7%(1M)

Market Cap11.9B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio22.26

ROE3.1%

P/B Ratio0.68

Dividend Yield4.4%

HOG

Harley-Davidson, Inc.

$26.76

-0.3%(1M)

Market Cap2.8B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

USA

P/E Ratio16.12

ROE6.3%

P/B Ratio0.93

Dividend Yield2.8%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

7270.T leads 5/8

7270.T

Subaru Corporation

-15.6%

1Y Return

HOG

Harley-Davidson, Inc.

-0.1%

1Y Return

7270.T

HOG

Short Term

1M-6M

+6.3%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+15.2%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

-8.7%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

7270.T: 3HOG: 2

Metric	7270.T	HOG	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	22.26	16.12	HOG
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.39	0.68	7270.T
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	0.68	0.93	7270.T
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	44.66	-20.93	HOG
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	3.66	9.13	7270.T
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

7270.T: 1HOG: 5

Metric	7270.T	HOG	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	14.2%	23.9%	HOG
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	2.9%	5.1%	HOG
Net Margin Net profit margin	1.8%	4.9%	HOG
ROE Return on equity	3.1%	6.3%	HOG
ROA Return on assets	1.6%	2.8%	HOG
ROIC Return on invested capital	3.3%	2.4%	7270.T

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

7270.T: 3HOG: 3

Metric	7270.T	HOG	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	2.1%	-13.8%	7270.T
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	8.2%	-8.1%	7270.T
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	11.1%	2.0%	7270.T
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	-72.6%	-19.2%	HOG
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	-21.7%	-17.6%	HOG
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	4.7%	219.1%	HOG

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

7270.T: 5HOG: 0

Metric	7270.T	HOG	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.13	0.74	7270.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	2.29	1.90	7270.T
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	1.75	1.70	7270.T
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	20.48	19.32	7270.T
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.08	1.32	7270.T

Summary

7270.T wins 2-1

Valuation

7270.T

Profitability

HOG

Growth

Tie

Balance Sheet

7270.T

7270.T is more attractively valued. HOG shows stronger profitability. 7270.T has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 7270.T and HOG with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 7270.T vs HOG on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/7270.T/vs/HOG" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 7270.T vs HOG on stockvs.app
</a>