Which stock is better: 7211.T or 7270.T?

The comparison between Mitsubishi Motors Corporation (7211.T) and Subaru Corporation (7270.T) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 7211.T vs 7270.T?

7211.T has a P/E ratio of 44.46, while 7270.T has a P/E ratio of 22.25. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 7211.T and 7270.T?

7211.T has a market cap of approximately 3B, while 7270.T has a market cap of approximately 11.9B.

7211.T vs 7270.T

Name: 7211.T Stock
Brand: Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
Price: 2.2465936 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, 7211.T returned -7% while 7270.T lost 16%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

7211.T

Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

$2.25

-2.9%(1M)

Market Cap3B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio44.46

ROE1.2%

P/B Ratio0.52

Dividend Yield2.8%

7270.T

Subaru Corporation

$16.74

0.7%(1M)

Market Cap11.9B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio22.26

ROE3.1%

P/B Ratio0.68

Dividend Yield4.4%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

7211.T

Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

-7.5%

1Y Return

7270.T

Subaru Corporation

-15.6%

1Y Return

7211.T

7270.T

Short Term

1M-6M

+3.1%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

-6.1%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

-8.7%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

7211.T: 37270.T: 2

Metric	7211.T	7270.T	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	44.46	22.26	7270.T
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.16	0.39	7211.T
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	0.52	0.68	7211.T
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	0.00	44.66	7211.T
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	3.85	3.66	7270.T
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

7211.T: 17270.T: 5

Metric	7211.T	7270.T	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	15.3%	14.2%	7211.T
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	2.8%	2.9%	7270.T
Net Margin Net profit margin	0.4%	1.8%	7270.T
ROE Return on equity	1.2%	3.1%	7270.T
ROA Return on assets	0.5%	1.6%	7270.T
ROIC Return on invested capital	1.9%	3.3%	7270.T

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

7211.T: 27270.T: 4

Metric	7211.T	7270.T	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	3.9%	2.1%	7211.T
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	5.6%	8.2%	7270.T
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	14.8%	11.1%	7211.T
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	-73.9%	-72.6%	7270.T
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	-59.6%	-21.7%	7270.T
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	4.7%	7270.T

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

7211.T: 07270.T: 5

Metric	7211.T	7270.T	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.45	0.13	7270.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	1.40	2.29	7270.T
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	1.00	1.75	7270.T
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	12.32	20.48	7270.T
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.24	0.08	7270.T

Summary

7270.T wins 3-1

Valuation

7211.T

Profitability

7270.T

Growth

7270.T

Balance Sheet

7270.T

7211.T is more attractively valued. 7270.T shows stronger profitability. 7270.T demonstrates better growth. 7270.T has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 7211.T and 7270.T with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 7211.T vs 7270.T on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/7211.T/vs/7270.T" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 7211.T vs 7270.T on stockvs.app
</a>