Which stock is better: AML.L or VFSWW?

The comparison between Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (AML.L) and VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFSWW) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of AML.L vs VFSWW?

AML.L has a P/E ratio of -0.60, while VFSWW has a P/E ratio of -1.75. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between AML.L and VFSWW?

AML.L has a market cap of approximately 383.8M, while VFSWW has a market cap of approximately 7.5B.

AML.L vs VFSWW

Name: AML.L Stock
Brand: Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc
Price: 37.82 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, VFSWW returned +10% while AML.L lost 42%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

AML.L

Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc

$37.82

15.4%(1M)

Market Cap383.8M

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio-0.60

ROE-166.6%

P/B Ratio2.11

Dividend Yield0.0%

VFSWW

VinFast Auto Ltd.

$0.24

27.0%(1M)

Market Cap7.5B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio-1.75

ROE61.7%

P/B Ratio-0.99

Dividend Yield0.0%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

VFSWW leads 6/8

AML.L

Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc

-42.4%

1Y Return

VFSWW

VinFast Auto Ltd.

+10.0%

1Y Return

AML.L

VFSWW

Short Term

1M-6M

+0.8%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+35.0%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

-86.8%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

AML.L: 1VFSWW: 4

Metric	AML.L	VFSWW	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	-0.60	-1.75	VFSWW
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.22	1.94	AML.L
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	2.11	-0.99	VFSWW
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	-1.49	-2.82	VFSWW
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	7.44	-4.10	VFSWW
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

AML.L: 5VFSWW: 1

Metric	AML.L	VFSWW	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	18.5%	-51.1%	AML.L
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	-13.3%	-84.8%	AML.L
Net Margin Net profit margin	-36.7%	-110.5%	AML.L
ROE Return on equity	-166.6%	61.7%	VFSWW
ROA Return on assets	-23.7%	-58.0%	AML.L
ROIC Return on invested capital	-11.5%	-113.7%	AML.L

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

AML.L: 0VFSWW: 4

Metric	AML.L	VFSWW	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	-20.6%	105.4%	VFSWW
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	-3.1%	86.6%	VFSWW
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	15.5%	45.9%	VFSWW
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	-28.2%	-25.6%	VFSWW
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

AML.L: 3VFSWW: 2

Metric	AML.L	VFSWW	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	8.94	-0.61	VFSWW
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	0.93	0.48	AML.L
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.49	0.27	AML.L
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	-1.43	-3.68	AML.L
Beta Stock volatility vs market	1.94	0.00	VFSWW

Summary

Valuation

VFSWW

Profitability

AML.L

Growth

VFSWW

Balance Sheet

AML.L

VFSWW is more attractively valued. AML.L shows stronger profitability. VFSWW demonstrates better growth. AML.L has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into AML.L and VFSWW with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare AML.L vs VFSWW on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/AML.L/vs/VFSWW" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare AML.L vs VFSWW on stockvs.app
</a>