Which stock is better: 7222.T or AML.L?

The comparison between Nissan Shatai Co., Ltd. (7222.T) and Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (AML.L) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 7222.T vs AML.L?

7222.T has a P/E ratio of 13.42, while AML.L has a P/E ratio of -0.60. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 7222.T and AML.L?

7222.T has a market cap of approximately 765.1M, while AML.L has a market cap of approximately 383.8M.

7222.T vs AML.L

Name: 7222.T Stock
Brand: Nissan Shatai Co., Ltd.
Price: 5.648144 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, 7222.T returned -22% while AML.L lost 42%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

7222.T

Nissan Shatai Co., Ltd.

$5.65

-3.1%(1M)

Market Cap765.1M

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio13.42

ROE4.9%

P/B Ratio0.65

Dividend Yield1.7%

AML.L

Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc

$37.82

15.4%(1M)

Market Cap383.8M

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio-0.60

ROE-166.6%

P/B Ratio2.11

Dividend Yield0.0%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

7222.T leads 6/8

7222.T

Nissan Shatai Co., Ltd.

-21.7%

1Y Return

AML.L

Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc

-42.4%

1Y Return

7222.T

AML.L

Short Term

1M-6M

+0.8%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

-18.2%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+4.7%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

7222.T: 2AML.L: 3

Metric	7222.T	AML.L	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	13.42	-0.60	AML.L
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.28	0.22	AML.L
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	0.65	2.11	7222.T
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	0.00	-1.49	AML.L
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	1.80	7.44	7222.T
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

7222.T: 5AML.L: 1

Metric	7222.T	AML.L	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	5.8%	18.5%	AML.L
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	4.0%	-13.3%	7222.T
Net Margin Net profit margin	2.1%	-36.7%	7222.T
ROE Return on equity	4.9%	-166.6%	7222.T
ROA Return on assets	3.1%	-23.7%	7222.T
ROIC Return on invested capital	6.0%	-11.5%	7222.T

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

7222.T: 5AML.L: 1

Metric	7222.T	AML.L	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	15.2%	-20.6%	7222.T
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	9.5%	-3.1%	7222.T
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	2.2%	15.5%	AML.L
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	127.3%	-28.2%	7222.T
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	21.1%	0.0%	7222.T
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	29.2%	0.0%	7222.T

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

7222.T: 5AML.L: 0

Metric	7222.T	AML.L	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.05	8.94	7222.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	1.86	0.93	7222.T
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	1.79	0.49	7222.T
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	455.79	-1.43	7222.T
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.51	1.94	7222.T

Summary

7222.T wins 3-1

Valuation

AML.L

Profitability

7222.T

Growth

7222.T

Balance Sheet

7222.T

AML.L is more attractively valued. 7222.T shows stronger profitability. 7222.T demonstrates better growth. 7222.T has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 7222.T and AML.L with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 7222.T vs AML.L on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/7222.T/vs/AML.L" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 7222.T vs AML.L on stockvs.app
</a>