Which stock is better: AML.L or RIVN?

The comparison between Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (AML.L) and Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of AML.L vs RIVN?

AML.L has a P/E ratio of -0.60, while RIVN has a P/E ratio of -4.81. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between AML.L and RIVN?

AML.L has a market cap of approximately 383.8M, while RIVN has a market cap of approximately 17.9B.

AML.L vs RIVN

Name: AML.L Stock
Brand: Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc
Price: 37.82 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, RIVN returned -4% while AML.L lost 42%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

AML.L

Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc

$37.82

15.4%(1M)

Market Cap383.8M

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio-0.60

ROE-166.6%

P/B Ratio2.11

Dividend Yield0.0%

RIVN

Rivian Automotive, Inc.

$12.42

-18.5%(1M)

Market Cap17.9B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

USA

P/E Ratio-4.81

ROE-67.5%

P/B Ratio3.12

Dividend Yield0.0%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

RIVN leads 5/8

AML.L

Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc

-42.4%

1Y Return

RIVN

Rivian Automotive, Inc.

-3.8%

1Y Return

AML.L

RIVN

Short Term

1M-6M

+0.8%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

-20.4%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

-70.7%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

AML.L: 2RIVN: 3

Metric	AML.L	RIVN	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	-0.60	-4.81	RIVN
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.22	3.05	AML.L
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	2.11	3.12	AML.L
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	-1.49	-5.14	RIVN
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	7.44	-9.21	RIVN
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

AML.L: 4RIVN: 2

Metric	AML.L	RIVN	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	18.5%	7.5%	AML.L
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	-13.3%	-60.1%	AML.L
Net Margin Net profit margin	-36.7%	-55.0%	AML.L
ROE Return on equity	-166.6%	-67.5%	RIVN
ROA Return on assets	-23.7%	-21.4%	RIVN
ROIC Return on invested capital	-11.5%	-30.4%	AML.L

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

AML.L: 1RIVN: 3

Metric	AML.L	RIVN	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	-20.6%	8.4%	RIVN
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	-3.1%	48.1%	RIVN
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	15.5%	0.0%	AML.L
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	-28.2%	34.5%	RIVN
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

AML.L: 1RIVN: 4

Metric	AML.L	RIVN	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	8.94	1.04	RIVN
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	0.93	2.10	RIVN
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.49	1.65	RIVN
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	-1.43	-13.28	AML.L
Beta Stock volatility vs market	1.94	1.62	RIVN

Summary

RIVN wins 3-1

Valuation

RIVN

Profitability

AML.L

Growth

RIVN

Balance Sheet

RIVN

RIVN is more attractively valued. AML.L shows stronger profitability. RIVN demonstrates better growth. RIVN has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into AML.L and RIVN with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare AML.L vs RIVN on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/AML.L/vs/RIVN" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare AML.L vs RIVN on stockvs.app
</a>