VS
stockvs
Go to ScreenerHub
AML.L

AML.L vs PAH3.DE

PAH3.DE

In the past 12 months, PAH3.DE returned -26% while AML.L lost 42%.

ValuationGrowthProfitabilityBalance SheetPerformance
AML.L
AML.L

Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc

$37.82
15.4%(1M)
Market Cap383.8M
Consumer Cyclical
Auto - Manufacturers
GB
P/E Ratio-0.60
ROE-166.6%
P/B Ratio2.11
Dividend Yield0.0%
PAH3.DE
PAH3.DE

Porsche Automobil Holding SE

$28.11
-13.0%(1M)
Market Cap8.6B
Consumer Cyclical
Auto - Manufacturers
DE
P/E Ratio-6.70
ROE0.3%
P/B Ratio0.21
Dividend Yield6.0%
Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

PAH3.DE leads 5/8
AML.L

AML.L

Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc

-42.4%

1Y Return

PAH3.DE

PAH3.DE

Porsche Automobil Holding SE

-26.4%

1Y Return

AML.L
AML.L
PAH3.DE
PAH3.DE

Short Term

1M-6M

AML.L
+0.8%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

PAH3.DE
-32.3%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

PAH3.DE
-54.9%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

AML.L: 2PAH3.DE: 3
MetricAML.LPAH3.DEWinner
P/E Ratio

Price to earnings ratio

-0.60-6.70PAH3.DE
Forward P/E

Forward price to earnings ratio

0.000.00Tie
P/S Ratio

Price to sales ratio

0.224.01AML.L
P/B Ratio

Price to book ratio

2.110.21PAH3.DE
P/FCF Ratio

Price to free cash flow ratio

-1.4931.64AML.L
EV/EBITDA

Enterprise value to EBITDA

7.44-160.55PAH3.DE
PEG Ratio

Price/earnings to growth ratio

0.000.00Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

AML.L: 0PAH3.DE: 6
MetricAML.LPAH3.DEWinner
Gross Margin

Gross profit margin

18.5%73.3%PAH3.DE
Operating Margin

Operating profit margin

-13.3%103.4%PAH3.DE
Net Margin

Net profit margin

-36.7%5.0%PAH3.DE
ROE

Return on equity

-166.6%0.3%PAH3.DE
ROA

Return on assets

-23.7%0.2%PAH3.DE
ROIC

Return on invested capital

-11.5%4.6%PAH3.DE

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

AML.L: 3PAH3.DE: 3
MetricAML.LPAH3.DEWinner
Revenue Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year revenue growth

-20.6%113.8%PAH3.DE
Revenue Growth (3Y)

3-year revenue CAGR

-3.1%-19.6%AML.L
Revenue Growth (5Y)

5-year revenue CAGR

15.5%0.3%AML.L
EPS Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year EPS growth

-28.2%113.2%PAH3.DE
EPS Growth (3Y)

3-year EPS CAGR

0.0%-21.6%AML.L
EPS Growth (5Y)

5-year EPS CAGR

0.0%0.2%PAH3.DE

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

AML.L: 0PAH3.DE: 5
MetricAML.LPAH3.DEWinner
Debt/Equity

Debt to equity ratio

8.940.19PAH3.DE
Current Ratio

Current assets to current liabilities

0.9313.73PAH3.DE
Quick Ratio

Quick assets to current liabilities

0.4913.73PAH3.DE
Interest Coverage

EBIT to interest expense

-1.436.69PAH3.DE
Beta

Stock volatility vs market

1.940.99PAH3.DE
Summary
PAH3.DE wins 3-0

Valuation

PAH3.DE

Profitability

PAH3.DE

Growth

Tie

Balance Sheet

PAH3.DE

PAH3.DE is more attractively valued. PAH3.DE shows stronger profitability. PAH3.DE has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons
7222.T 7222.T vs AML.L AML.LAML.L AML.L vs PSNY PSNYAML.L AML.L vs LOT LOT7222.T 7222.T vs PAH3.DE PAH3.DEPAH3.DE PAH3.DE vs PSNY PSNYLOT LOT vs PAH3.DE PAH3.DE
Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into AML.L and PAH3.DE with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison
Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare AML.L vs PAH3.DE on stockvs.app
<a href="https://stockvs.app/AML.L/vs/PAH3.DE" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare AML.L vs PAH3.DE on stockvs.app
</a>