Which stock is better: AML.L or LOTWW?

The comparison between Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc (AML.L) and Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants (LOTWW) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of AML.L vs LOTWW?

AML.L has a P/E ratio of -0.60, while LOTWW has a P/E ratio of -0.86. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between AML.L and LOTWW?

AML.L has a market cap of approximately 383.8M, while LOTWW has a market cap of approximately 330.5M.

AML.L vs LOTWW

Name: AML.L Stock
Brand: Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc
Price: 37.82 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, AML.L returned -42% while LOTWW lost 49%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

AML.L

Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc

$37.82

15.4%(1M)

Market Cap383.8M

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio-0.60

ROE-166.6%

P/B Ratio2.11

Dividend Yield0.0%

LOTWW

Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants

$0.04

-14.2%(1M)

Market Cap330.5M

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio-0.86

ROE34.7%

P/B Ratio-0.28

Dividend Yield0.0%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

AML.L leads 6/8

AML.L

Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc

-42.4%

1Y Return

LOTWW

Lotus Technology Inc. Warrants

-48.5%

1Y Return

AML.L

LOTWW

Short Term

1M-6M

+0.8%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

-41.4%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

-92.5%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

AML.L: 2LOTWW: 3

Metric	AML.L	LOTWW	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	-0.60	-0.86	LOTWW
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.22	0.53	AML.L
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	2.11	-0.28	LOTWW
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	-1.49	0.00	AML.L
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	7.44	-6.61	LOTWW
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

AML.L: 4LOTWW: 2

Metric	AML.L	LOTWW	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	18.5%	8.7%	AML.L
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	-13.3%	-52.8%	AML.L
Net Margin Net profit margin	-36.7%	-62.3%	AML.L
ROE Return on equity	-166.6%	34.7%	LOTWW
ROA Return on assets	-23.7%	-22.7%	LOTWW
ROIC Return on invested capital	-11.5%	-42.2%	AML.L

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

AML.L: 2LOTWW: 2

Metric	AML.L	LOTWW	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	-20.6%	-43.8%	AML.L
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	-3.1%	278.7%	LOTWW
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	15.5%	0.0%	AML.L
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	-28.2%	58.1%	LOTWW
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	0.0%	0.0%	Tie

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

AML.L: 3LOTWW: 2

Metric	AML.L	LOTWW	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	8.94	-1.36	LOTWW
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	0.93	0.32	AML.L
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.49	0.25	AML.L
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	-1.43	-5.78	AML.L
Beta Stock volatility vs market	1.94	0.44	LOTWW

Summary

AML.L wins 2-1

Valuation

LOTWW

Profitability

AML.L

Growth

Tie

Balance Sheet

AML.L

LOTWW is more attractively valued. AML.L shows stronger profitability. AML.L has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into AML.L and LOTWW with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare AML.L vs LOTWW on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/AML.L/vs/LOTWW" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare AML.L vs LOTWW on stockvs.app
</a>