Which stock is better: 7269.T or RNL.DE?

The comparison between Suzuki Motor Corporation (7269.T) and Renault S.A. (RNL.DE) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 7269.T vs RNL.DE?

7269.T has a P/E ratio of 7.84, while RNL.DE has a P/E ratio of 8.39. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 7269.T and RNL.DE?

7269.T has a market cap of approximately 25.9B, while RNL.DE has a market cap of approximately 9B.

7269.T vs RNL.DE

Name: 7269.T Stock
Brand: Suzuki Motor Corporation
Price: 13.411176 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, 7269.T returned -5% while RNL.DE lost 19%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

7269.T

Suzuki Motor Corporation

$13.41

4.5%(1M)

Market Cap25.9B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio7.85

ROE15.6%

P/B Ratio1.15

Dividend Yield2.3%

RNL.DE

Renault S.A.

$31.04

-2.6%(1M)

Market Cap9B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio8.39

ROE4.6%

P/B Ratio0.40

Dividend Yield8.0%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

7269.T leads 8/8

7269.T

Suzuki Motor Corporation

-4.9%

1Y Return

RNL.DE

Renault S.A.

-18.8%

1Y Return

7269.T

RNL.DE

Short Term

1M-6M

+6.0%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

-8.2%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+79.9%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

7269.T: 2RNL.DE: 3

Metric	7269.T	RNL.DE	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	7.85	8.39	7269.T
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.62	0.13	RNL.DE
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	1.15	0.40	RNL.DE
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	12.73	4.00	RNL.DE
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	3.83	9.43	7269.T
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

7269.T: 6RNL.DE: 0

Metric	7269.T	RNL.DE	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	24.9%	17.1%	7269.T
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	9.0%	3.5%	7269.T
Net Margin Net profit margin	7.9%	1.6%	7269.T
ROE Return on equity	15.6%	4.6%	7269.T
ROA Return on assets	7.7%	0.8%	7269.T
ROIC Return on invested capital	8.1%	1.5%	7269.T

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

7269.T: 6RNL.DE: 0

Metric	7269.T	RNL.DE	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	8.0%	0.0%	7269.T
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	10.7%	0.0%	7269.T
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	14.6%	0.0%	7269.T
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	5.6%	0.0%	7269.T
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	26.0%	0.0%	7269.T
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	24.7%	0.0%	7269.T

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

7269.T: 5RNL.DE: 0

Metric	7269.T	RNL.DE	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.21	3.52	7269.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	1.81	1.03	7269.T
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	1.36	0.96	7269.T
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	19.74	11.25	7269.T
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.40	0.81	7269.T

Summary

7269.T wins 3-1

Valuation

RNL.DE

Profitability

7269.T

Growth

7269.T

Balance Sheet

7269.T

RNL.DE is more attractively valued. 7269.T shows stronger profitability. 7269.T demonstrates better growth. 7269.T has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 7269.T and RNL.DE with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 7269.T vs RNL.DE on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/7269.T/vs/RNL.DE" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 7269.T vs RNL.DE on stockvs.app
</a>