Which stock is better: GS or MS?

The comparison between The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of GS vs MS?

GS has a P/E ratio of 24.01, while MS has a P/E ratio of 23.27. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between GS and MS?

GS has a market cap of approximately 311.2B, while MS has a market cap of approximately 332.8B.

GS vs MS

Name: GS Stock
Brand: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Price: 1055.03 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, MS returned +50% while GS gained 49%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

$1,055.03

-4.6%(1M)

Market Cap311.2B

Financial Services

Financial - Capital Markets

USA

P/E Ratio24.01

ROE17.0%

P/B Ratio154.53

Dividend Yield1.6%

Morgan Stanley

$210.97

-7.1%(1M)

Market Cap332.8B

Financial Services

Financial - Capital Markets

USA

P/E Ratio23.27

ROE18.2%

P/B Ratio2.96

Dividend Yield1.9%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

GS leads 5/8

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

+49.4%

1Y Return

Morgan Stanley

+50.2%

1Y Return

Short Term

1M-6M

+6.5%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+34.7%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+314.0%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

GS: 0MS: 5

Metric	GS	MS	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	24.01	23.27	MS
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	3.15	2.65	MS
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	154.53	2.96	MS
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	-7.50	-323.07	MS
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	29.41	20.46	MS
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

GS: 0MS: 6

Metric	GS	MS	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	47.4%	56.6%	MS
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	17.8%	28.4%	MS
Net Margin Net profit margin	14.4%	20.2%	MS
ROE Return on equity	17.0%	18.2%	MS
ROA Return on assets	1.0%	1.3%	MS
ROIC Return on invested capital	1.1%	2.2%	MS

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

GS: 3MS: 3

Metric	GS	MS	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	-1.4%	11.5%	MS
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	22.1%	22.5%	MS
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	18.5%	18.3%	GS
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	26.6%	28.3%	MS
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	19.5%	18.4%	GS
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	15.7%	9.6%	GS

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

GS: 3MS: 2

Metric	GS	MS	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.04	3.45	GS
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	2.08	1.61	GS
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	2.08	1.61	GS
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	0.35	0.58	MS
Beta Stock volatility vs market	1.29	1.22	MS

Summary

MS wins 2-1

Valuation

Profitability

Growth

Tie

Balance Sheet

MS is more attractively valued. MS shows stronger profitability. GS has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into GS and MS with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare GS vs MS on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/GS/vs/MS" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare GS vs MS on stockvs.app
</a>