VS
stockvs
Go to ScreenerHub
COST

COST vs WMT

WMT

In the past 12 months, WMT returned +44% while COST gained 9%.

COST
COST

Costco Wholesale Corporation

$1,001.74
-1.0%(1M)
Market Cap444.5B
Consumer Defensive
Discount Stores
USA
P/E Ratio51.79
ROE28.8%
P/B Ratio13.80
Dividend Yield0.5%
WMT
WMT

Walmart Inc.

$125.99
-2.2%(1M)
Market Cap1T
Consumer Defensive
Discount Stores
USA
P/E Ratio45.55
ROE23.7%
P/B Ratio10.01
Dividend Yield0.8%
Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

COST leads 5/8
COST

COST

Costco Wholesale Corporation

+9.3%

1Y Return

WMT

WMT

Walmart Inc.

+44.1%

1Y Return

COST
COST
WMT
WMT

Short Term

1M-6M

WMT
+9.6%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

WMT
+27.9%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

COST
+287.3%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

COST: 1WMT: 4
MetricCOSTWMTWinner
P/E Ratio

Price to earnings ratio

51.7945.55WMT
Forward P/E

Forward price to earnings ratio

0.000.00Tie
P/S Ratio

Price to sales ratio

1.551.40WMT
P/B Ratio

Price to book ratio

13.8010.01WMT
P/FCF Ratio

Price to free cash flow ratio

48.6566.85COST
EV/EBITDA

Enterprise value to EBITDA

30.2622.42WMT
PEG Ratio

Price/earnings to growth ratio

0.000.00Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

COST: 3WMT: 3
MetricCOSTWMTWinner
Gross Margin

Gross profit margin

12.9%24.9%WMT
Operating Margin

Operating profit margin

3.8%4.2%WMT
Net Margin

Net profit margin

3.0%3.1%WMT
ROE

Return on equity

28.8%23.7%COST
ROA

Return on assets

10.2%7.7%COST
ROIC

Return on invested capital

19.1%11.9%COST

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

COST: 4WMT: 2
MetricCOSTWMTWinner
Revenue Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year revenue growth

8.2%4.7%COST
Revenue Growth (3Y)

3-year revenue CAGR

6.6%5.3%COST
Revenue Growth (5Y)

5-year revenue CAGR

10.5%5.0%COST
EPS Growth (YoY)

Year-over-year EPS growth

10.0%13.3%WMT
EPS Growth (3Y)

3-year EPS CAGR

11.5%24.3%WMT
EPS Growth (5Y)

5-year EPS CAGR

15.1%11.0%COST

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

COST: 4WMT: 1
MetricCOSTWMTWinner
Debt/Equity

Debt to equity ratio

0.080.67COST
Current Ratio

Current assets to current liabilities

1.060.79COST
Quick Ratio

Quick assets to current liabilities

0.590.24COST
Interest Coverage

EBIT to interest expense

73.4210.66COST
Beta

Stock volatility vs market

0.990.00WMT
Summary
COST wins 2-1

Valuation

WMT

Profitability

Tie

Growth

COST

Balance Sheet

COST

WMT is more attractively valued. COST demonstrates better growth. COST has a stronger balance sheet.

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into COST and WMT with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison
Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

<a href="https://stockvs.app/COST/vs/WMT" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare COST vs WMT on stockvs.app
</a>