Which stock is better: BAC or C?

The comparison between Bank of America Corporation (BAC) and Citigroup Inc. (C) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of BAC vs C?

BAC has a P/E ratio of 14.20, while C has a P/E ratio of 14.24. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between BAC and C?

BAC has a market cap of approximately 447.4B, while C has a market cap of approximately 236.9B.

BAC vs C

Name: BAC Stock
Brand: Bank of America Corporation
Price: 63.04 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, C returned +45% while BAC gained 26%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

BAC

Bank of America Corporation

$63.04

0.9%(1M)

Market Cap447.4B

Financial Services

Banks - Diversified

USA

P/E Ratio14.20

ROE11.1%

P/B Ratio1.49

Dividend Yield1.8%

Citigroup Inc.

$138.14

3.4%(1M)

Market Cap236.9B

Financial Services

Banks - Diversified

USA

P/E Ratio14.24

ROE8.4%

P/B Ratio1.08

Dividend Yield1.8%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

C leads 5/8

BAC

Bank of America Corporation

+25.9%

1Y Return

Citigroup Inc.

+45.4%

1Y Return

BAC

Short Term

1M-6M

+15.8%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+31.9%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+173.4%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

BAC: 1C: 4

Metric	BAC	C	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	14.20	14.24	BAC
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	2.28	1.32	C
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	1.49	1.08	C
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	4.69	-9.39	C
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	25.14	23.21	C
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

BAC: 5C: 1

Metric	BAC	C	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	59.3%	46.6%	BAC
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	22.5%	14.2%	BAC
Net Margin Net profit margin	17.2%	10.2%	BAC
ROE Return on equity	11.1%	8.4%	BAC
ROA Return on assets	1.0%	0.6%	BAC
ROIC Return on invested capital	1.0%	1.7%	C

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

BAC: 5C: 1

Metric	BAC	C	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	-0.5%	-1.4%	BAC
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	18.5%	18.9%	C
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	15.4%	13.6%	BAC
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	18.6%	17.5%	BAC
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	6.2%	-0.0%	BAC
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	15.4%	8.1%	BAC

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

BAC: 2C: 3

Metric	BAC	C	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	2.43	3.84	BAC
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	0.07	0.47	C
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	0.07	0.47	C
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	0.59	0.30	BAC
Beta Stock volatility vs market	1.17	1.10	C

Summary

Valuation

Profitability

BAC

Growth

BAC

Balance Sheet

C is more attractively valued. BAC shows stronger profitability. BAC demonstrates better growth. C has a stronger balance sheet.

Related Comparisons

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into BAC and C with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare BAC vs C on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/BAC/vs/C" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare BAC vs C on stockvs.app
</a>