Which stock is better: 7261.T or 7269.T?

The comparison between Mazda Motor Corporation (7261.T) and Suzuki Motor Corporation (7269.T) depends on your investment criteria. Compare valuation, profitability, growth, and risk metrics to determine which aligns better with your investment goals.

What is the P/E ratio of 7261.T vs 7269.T?

7261.T has a P/E ratio of 85.36, while 7269.T has a P/E ratio of 9.84. A lower P/E ratio may indicate a more attractive valuation.

What is the market cap difference between 7261.T and 7269.T?

7261.T has a market cap of approximately 4.5B, while 7269.T has a market cap of approximately 22.9B.

7261.T vs 7269.T

Name: 7261.T Stock
Brand: Mazda Motor Corporation
Price: 7.16461995 USD
Availability: InStock

In the past 12 months, 7261.T returned +10% while 7269.T gained 4%.

Valuation Growth Profitability Balance Sheet Performance

7261.T

Mazda Motor Corporation

$7.16

-15.2%(1M)

Market Cap4.5B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio85.36

ROE0.5%

P/B Ratio0.41

Dividend Yield4.6%

7269.T

Suzuki Motor Corporation

$11.89

-19.1%(1M)

Market Cap22.9B

Consumer Cyclical

Auto - Manufacturers

P/E Ratio9.84

ROE13.3%

P/B Ratio1.22

Dividend Yield2.1%

Performance Comparison

Historical returns across multiple timeframes

7261.T leads 5/8

7261.T

Mazda Motor Corporation

+9.8%

1Y Return

7269.T

Suzuki Motor Corporation

+4.4%

1Y Return

7261.T

7269.T

Short Term

1M-6M

-5.6%

Medium Term

YTD-1Y

+0.9%

Long Term

3Y-10Y

+92.9%

Valuation

Compare price multiples and valuation ratios

7261.T: 37269.T: 2

Metric	7261.T	7269.T	Winner
P/E Ratio Price to earnings ratio	85.36	9.84	7269.T
Forward P/E Forward price to earnings ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie
P/S Ratio Price to sales ratio	0.16	0.67	7261.T
P/B Ratio Price to book ratio	0.41	1.22	7261.T
P/FCF Ratio Price to free cash flow ratio	-7.00	15.61	7261.T
EV/EBITDA Enterprise value to EBITDA	6.15	4.07	7269.T
PEG Ratio Price/earnings to growth ratio	0.00	0.00	Tie

Profitability

Compare profit margins and returns on capital

7261.T: 07269.T: 6

Metric	7261.T	7269.T	Winner
Gross Margin Gross profit margin	18.2%	25.7%	7269.T
Operating Margin Operating profit margin	0.3%	9.4%	7269.T
Net Margin Net profit margin	0.2%	6.8%	7269.T
ROE Return on equity	0.5%	13.3%	7269.T
ROA Return on assets	0.2%	6.4%	7269.T
ROIC Return on invested capital	0.5%	8.2%	7269.T

Growth

Compare revenue and earnings growth rates

7261.T: 17269.T: 5

Metric	7261.T	7269.T	Winner
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year revenue growth	4.0%	8.4%	7269.T
Revenue Growth (3Y) 3-year revenue CAGR	17.2%	17.7%	7269.T
Revenue Growth (5Y) 5-year revenue CAGR	7.9%	10.8%	7269.T
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year EPS growth	-45.1%	31.6%	7269.T
EPS Growth (3Y) 3-year EPS CAGR	11.8%	37.7%	7269.T
EPS Growth (5Y) 5-year EPS CAGR	56.5%	-27.9%	7261.T

Balance Sheet & Risk

Compare financial stability and debt levels

7261.T: 07269.T: 5

Metric	7261.T	7269.T	Winner
Debt/Equity Debt to equity ratio	0.50	0.23	7269.T
Current Ratio Current assets to current liabilities	1.60	1.66	7269.T
Quick Ratio Quick assets to current liabilities	1.08	1.23	7269.T
Interest Coverage EBIT to interest expense	1.46	21.30	7269.T
Beta Stock volatility vs market	0.33	0.24	7269.T

Summary

7269.T wins 3-1

Valuation

7261.T

Profitability

7269.T

Growth

7269.T

Balance Sheet

7269.T

7261.T is more attractively valued. 7269.T shows stronger profitability. 7269.T demonstrates better growth. 7269.T has a stronger balance sheet.

Take Your Analysis Further

Dive deeper into 7261.T and 7269.T with Screenerhub. Access advanced screening tools, set up monitoring alerts, and discover more investment opportunities.

Embed This Comparison

Free

Add this comparison widget to your blog or website:

Compare 7261.T vs 7269.T on stockvs.app

<a href="https://stockvs.app/7261.T/vs/7269.T" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" style="display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px; padding: 8px 16px; background: linear-gradient(135deg, #3b82f6, #8b5cf6); color: white; text-decoration: none; border-radius: 8px; font-family: system-ui, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 500;">
  <svg width="16" height="16" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round"><path d="M18 20V10"/><path d="M12 20V4"/><path d="M6 20v-6"/></svg>
  Compare 7261.T vs 7269.T on stockvs.app
</a>